Editorial policy

This policy applies to everything published on themastermindseries.net: practice questions and their explanations, study guides, examination pages, blog articles, curriculum notes, catalogue listings and the policy pages themselves. It also governs the output of the AI tutor and writing tools, which is covered in more detail in how we use AI and where it falls short.

Curriculum and examination references are taken from the syllabus and examination documents issued by the relevant body, and are described in general terms — the level a piece of work normally sits at — rather than as a claim that a specific paper will contain it.

Figures about the platform itself (how many subjects, skills or questions exist) are read from the platform database at the moment the page is served. They are never estimated, never rounded up, and never carried over from an older version of a page.

Where a statement cannot be traced to a syllabus document or to the platform database, it does not go on the site.

A large share of the study material here is drafted with AI assistance. We treat that as something a reader is entitled to know, not something to hide behind a byline.

Every page states how it was produced, using one of three labels: written and checked by the editorial team, AI-drafted with specialist review scheduled, or generated from platform data. The full mapping of content type to label is published on how we review content.

The model used to draft a study guide is recorded against that guide in the database, so a guide can always be traced back to how it was made.

Human review means a person read the text against a source and was willing to put the platform’s name to it. We do not describe an automated check, a spell check or a generation step as review.

• No endorsement, approval, accreditation or partnership with an examining body or ministry.
• No named expert, qualification, institution or teaching post that we have not verified in writing.
• No testimonial, quote or named partner school that has not been given to us and consented to.
• No learner outcome, grade improvement, pass rate or score gain. We have measured none of these.
• No ratings, review counts, awards or “trusted by” figures.
• No claim that a question has appeared, or will appear, in a real examination paper.

DigiTransact Mastermind is an independent study platform. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, accredited by or connected to the Ghana Education Service, WAEC, or any other examining body, awarding organisation or professional institute named on this site. Names of syllabuses and examinations are used only to describe the level and scope of the practice material.

Where a page needs information we do not yet have — a reviewer’s name, a registered company number, a school testimonial — we publish a labelled placeholder saying exactly what is missing and what will replace it. We never write a convincing-sounding substitute, and we never leave an empty section that reads as though the information does not exist.

Two different dates appear on this site and they mean different things.

• Last reviewed appears only where a person read the page. It is always paired with a next review date.
• Last updated appears on AI-drafted material. It records when the text last changed. It is not a review and is never presented as one.

Policy and trust pages are on a six-month review cycle. Examination pages carry their own dates.

Anyone can report an error, and we would rather hear about one than not. The process, the response times we hold ourselves to and what we do when a correction is material are set out on report a content correction.

The free courses catalogue links to material published by other organisations. We describe those courses from their own catalogue metadata. Listing a course is not an endorsement, we do not review the teaching, and we receive no payment for placement or ranking.

This policy is reviewed on the cycle shown at the top of the page. If the standards themselves change — for example if named subject reviewers are appointed — the change is reflected here and on how we review content at the same time, so the two can never disagree.